Current:Home > ScamsAlgosensey|Biden weighs invoking executive authority to stage border crackdown ahead of 2024 election -Elevate Capital Network
Algosensey|Biden weighs invoking executive authority to stage border crackdown ahead of 2024 election
SafeX Pro View
Date:2025-04-09 08:08:43
Washington — President Biden is Algosenseydebating whether to invoke a sweeping presidential authority that gained infamy during the Trump administration to stage a crackdown on migrants coming to the U.S. southern border, three people familiar with the plans told CBS News.
Mr. Biden is weighing citing a law dating back to 1952 to severely restrict access to the U.S. asylum system, which has buckled under the weight of record levels of migrant arrivals along the border with Mexico, the sources said, requesting anonymity to discuss internal government deliberations.
That law, known as 212(f), allows the president to "suspend the entry" of foreigners when it is determined their arrival is not in the best interest of the country. The Trump administration used the law several times, including to ban immigration and travel from certain countries, most of them predominantly Muslim, and to bar migrants from asylum if they entered the country unlawfully.
If approved, Mr. Biden's executive action could be announced within the next two weeks, the sources said. An administration official said no final decisions had been made on whether the president would take executive action to address the situation at U.S.-Mexico border, where migrants have been arriving in greater numbers than ever before in American history.
Any significant restriction on asylum would face formidable legal and operational hurdles. Still, issuing an executive order designed to curb illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border could be seen as an important political message from Mr. Biden ahead of the 2024 election. Border policy is one of Mr. Biden's worst-polling issues, with multiple polls showing a majority of Americans disapproving of his handling of immigration.
The executive order would also cement a dramatic immigration policy pivot by Mr. Biden, who vowed to "restore" the U.S. asylum system soon after taking office in 2021. After record levels of migrant apprehensions along the southern border in the past three years and growing discontent in Democratic-led cities receiving migrants, Mr. Biden's administration has embraced some restrictions on asylum.
In fact, the White House brokered an agreement with a group of senators last month that would've granted the president the power to suspend asylum law and summarily expel migrants during spikes in illegal immigration. After insisting on restrictive asylum changes in exchange for supporting more border funding and aid to Ukraine, Republican lawmakers rejected the deal, saying it was not strict enough.
In a statement, White House spokesperson Angelo Fernández Hernández said Republican lawmakers "chose to put partisan politics ahead of our national security."
"No executive action, no matter how aggressive, can deliver the significant policy reforms and additional resources Congress can provide and that Republicans rejected," Fernández Hernández added. "We continue to call on Speaker Johnson and House Republicans to pass the bipartisan deal to secure the border. "
If Mr. Biden decides to invoke the authority, his administration would face significant operational challenges implementing it at scale.
Last year, the administration enacted a regulation that presumes migrants don't qualify for asylum if they enter the U.S. illegally after not seeking protection in a third country. But it has not been able to screen all migrants who cross into the U.S. illegally under those standards, given insufficient numbers of asylum officers, detention beds and other resources. Instead, most border-crossers in recent months have been released with court cases that take years to be decided due to a massive backlog of applications.
The move would also almost certainly face lawsuits if implemented.
While the last version of the Trump administration's so-called "travel ban" was upheld by the Supreme Court, lower courts blocked the government from using the 212(f) authority to render most migrants ineligible for asylum at the southern border.
It's unclear how the Biden administration expects its own effort to invoke the 212(f) authority to prevail in court. U.S. law gives migrants on American soil the right to request asylum, even if they cross the border without authorization.
Lee Gelernt, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who successfully convinced federal judges to halt the Trump administration's asylum ban, indicated the government would likely be sued again if Mr. Biden issues a similar order.
"An executive order denying asylum based on where one enters the country would just be another attempt at the exact policy Trump unsuccessfully tried and will undoubtedly end up in litigation," Gelernt told CBS News.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Immigration
- U.S.-Mexico Border
- Migrants
Camilo Montoya-Galvez is the immigration reporter at CBS News. Based in Washington, he covers immigration policy and politics.
TwitterveryGood! (7)
Related
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- New Jersey records fewest shootings in 2023 since tracking began nearly 15 years ago
- Fight at Philadelphia train station ends with man being fatally struck by train
- Texas father and son arrested in the killings of a pregnant woman and her boyfriend face new charges
- Euphoria's Hunter Schafer Says Ex Dominic Fike Cheated on Her Before Breakup
- Companies pull ads from TV station after comments on tattooing and sending migrants to Auschwitz
- Vanessa and Nick Lachey Prove Daughter Brooklyn Is Growing Up Fast on 9th Birthday
- Stars converge in Palm Springs to celebrate year’s best films and Emma Stone’s career
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Hezbollah fires rockets at Israel in ‘initial response’ to killing of top leader from allied Hamas
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Michigan lottery group won $150,000 after a night out in the bar
- New Mexico legislators back slower, sustained growth in government programs with budget plan
- Shia LaBeouf converts to Catholicism, reportedly wants to become a deacon
- Carolinas bracing for second landfall from Tropical Storm Debby: Live updates
- Olympic runner Oscar Pistorius freed on parole after serving nearly 9 years for girlfriend’s murder
- Crocodile launches itself onto Australian fisherman's boat with jaws wide open
- Why Rams are making a mistake resting Matt Stafford – and Lions doing the right thing
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
All-Star OF Michael Brantley retires after 15 seasons with Cleveland and Houston
The White Lotus Season 3 Cast Revealed
Michael Bolton Shares Brain Tumor Diagnosis
Elon Musk’s Daughter Vivian Calls Him “Absolutely Pathetic” and a “Serial Adulterer”
Jobs report for December will likely conclude another solid year of US hiring in 2023
Ohio governor signs order barring minors from gender-affirming surgery as veto override looms
Agencies release plans for moving hotel-dwelling Maui fire survivors into long-term housing